Alternatives to RWS
mkatliar
✭
Is there an alternative to RWS which can perform the same set of basic tasks (start/stop RAPID program, get/set robot targets, IOs, variables etc.), but is less expensive in terms of communication overhead?
Tagged:
0
Comments
-
PC SDK or any of the OPC servers can do these things. What is you problem with overhead? are the data transfers to slow?—Nils OlofssonPC Software Support Engineer0
-
@NilsOlofsson yes. Below is my benchmark of typical RWS requests to the robot:------------------------------------------------------------Benchmark Time CPU Iterations------------------------------------------------------------BM_getIoSignals 20.2 ms 1.62 ms 452BM_getIoSignal 2.21 ms 0.199 ms 3546BM_setIoSignal 2.07 ms 0.090 ms 7509BM_getJointTarget 2.44 ms 0.286 ms 2668BM_getRobTarget 2.73 ms 0.379 ms 1000
Things like getting/setting an IO or getting joint/TCP position take ~2-3ms. And getting all IO values takes 20ms, which is really a lot (and we don't have lots of IOs).
Can you tell me more about PC SDK and OPC servers? What communication protocol do they use?0 -
PC SDK as well as the OPC servers along with their manuals are available at https://developercenter.robotstudio.com/
PC SDK mainly uses the ROB API to communicate with the controller, but for some requests it will use the RWS API.
The ROB API uses TCP/IP.
The OPC servers are built using PC SDK—Nils OlofssonPC Software Support Engineer0
Categories
- All Categories
- 5.5K RobotStudio
- 394 UpFeed
- 18 Tutorials
- 13 RobotApps
- 297 PowerPacs
- 405 RobotStudio S4
- 1.8K Developer Tools
- 249 ScreenMaker
- 2.7K Robot Controller
- 309 IRC5
- 59 OmniCore
- 7 RCS (Realistic Controller Simulation)
- 785 RAPID Programming
- AppStudio
- 3 RobotStudio AR Viewer
- 18 Wizard Easy Programming
- 105 Collaborative Robots
- 4 Job listings