Forum Migration Notice
We're transitioning to a more modern community platform by the end of this year. Learn about the upcoming changes and what to expect.
Avoid using x link/links during kinematics
EmaB
✭
Hello, is there a way to avoid using a specific link in the implicit calculation of the inverse kinematics?
I am referring in particular to the IRB14050, where the 4° link is modeled as a separated mechanical unit inside its controller, but of course this may be useful for other types of manipulators. My idea was to "disable" this link and see if the controller was able to IK some paths withouth it.
I don't think there's a specific command to do it, but maybe with some manipulation in the controller settings it's possible.
I am referring in particular to the IRB14050, where the 4° link is modeled as a separated mechanical unit inside its controller, but of course this may be useful for other types of manipulators. My idea was to "disable" this link and see if the controller was able to IK some paths withouth it.
I don't think there's a specific command to do it, but maybe with some manipulation in the controller settings it's possible.
Tagged:
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 5.6K RobotStudio
- 401 UpFeed
- 21 Tutorials
- 16 RobotApps
- 306 PowerPacs
- 407 RobotStudio S4
- 1.8K Developer Tools
- 250 ScreenMaker
- 2.9K Robot Controller
- 365 IRC5
- 86 OmniCore
- 8 RCS (Realistic Controller Simulation)
- 854 RAPID Programming
- 37 AppStudio
- 4 RobotStudio AR Viewer
- 19 Wizard Easy Programming
- 111 Collaborative Robots
- 5 Job listings