Forum Migration Notice
Update (2026-01-12): The user forums will be put into read-only mode on the 21st of January, 00:00 CET, to prepare for the data migration.
We're transitioning to a more modern community platform by beginning of next year. Learn about the upcoming changes and what to expect.
We're transitioning to a more modern community platform by beginning of next year. Learn about the upcoming changes and what to expect.
Avoid using x link/links during kinematics
EmaB
✭
Hello, is there a way to avoid using a specific link in the implicit calculation of the inverse kinematics?
I am referring in particular to the IRB14050, where the 4° link is modeled as a separated mechanical unit inside its controller, but of course this may be useful for other types of manipulators. My idea was to "disable" this link and see if the controller was able to IK some paths withouth it.
I don't think there's a specific command to do it, but maybe with some manipulation in the controller settings it's possible.
I am referring in particular to the IRB14050, where the 4° link is modeled as a separated mechanical unit inside its controller, but of course this may be useful for other types of manipulators. My idea was to "disable" this link and see if the controller was able to IK some paths withouth it.
I don't think there's a specific command to do it, but maybe with some manipulation in the controller settings it's possible.
Tagged:
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 5.7K RobotStudio
- 402 UpFeed
- 21 Tutorials
- 16 RobotApps
- 307 PowerPacs
- 407 RobotStudio S4
- 1.8K Developer Tools
- 251 ScreenMaker
- 2.9K Robot Controller
- 368 IRC5
- 92 OmniCore
- 8 RCS (Realistic Controller Simulation)
- 859 RAPID Programming
- 43 AppStudio
- 4 RobotStudio AR Viewer
- 19 Wizard Easy Programming
- 111 Collaborative Robots
- 5 Job listings